Below criterion can be used as a guidance to review the manuscript submitted for our
future conferences or journals.
Please use it accordingly.
PURPOSE
Excellent
The purpose of the research is well presented and able to give clear description towards the current condition or phenomenon that becomes the object of research systematically.
Good
The purpose of the research is able to give clear description towards the phenomenon that becomes the object of research, but not in systematic way.
Fair
The purpose of the research is vividly able to give clear description towards the current condition or phenomenon that becomes the object of research.
Poor
The purpose of the research is not able to give clear description towards the current condition or phenomenon that becomes the object of research.
RESEARCH DESIGN | METHODOLOGY | APPROACH
Excellent
The research design is able to give clear description towards how the research process can deliver the result.
Good
The research design are mentioned but are not specifically correlated to give clear description towards how the research process can deliver the result.
Fair
The research design is vividly able to give clear description towards how the research process can deliver the result.
Poor
The research design is not able to give clear description towards how the research process can deliver the result.
THEORITICAL BACKGROUND
Excellent
Good
The theoretical background is somewhat original and can provide the gaps of the research.
Fair
Poor
The theoretical background is not specified and not able to provide the gaps of the research.
FINDINGS
Excellent
Good
The findings are considered valid but not presented systematically.
Fair
Poor
The findings are not valid.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
Excellent
Good
The limitation is given and aligned with the findings.
Fair
Poor
The limitation is not given and not aligned with the findings.
ORIGINALITY OF VALUE
Excellent
scientific and practical scholarship.
Good
The research is quite original and able to provide novelty towards the scientific and practical scholarship.
Fair
Poor
The research is not original.
READABILITY AND WRITING STYLE
Excellent
Good
The paper is understandable and systematic.
Fair
Poor
The paper is incomprehensible.
QUALITY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Excellent
effectively.
Good
The use of the language is understandable. The manuscript shows cohesion and coherence.
Fair
Poor
The language is not understandable and failed to convey the meaning.
TOPIC SUITABILITY
Excellent
Good
The topic is quite suitable with the conference field of study and or similar even though did not specifically stated in the conference website.
Fair
Poor
The topic is not suitable with the conference field of study.